North Koreas millennium eruption flooded the skies with sulfur but left little

first_img Email Clive Oppenheimer, a volcanologist at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and a co-author on the new paper, examines exposed ash at Mount Paektu from the millennium eruption. To estimate that missing sulfur, Iacovino and her co-authors had to model the crystallization of the magma as it cooled in its reservoir. Certain elements form crystals relatively easily, whereas others, like uranium, resist crystallization. After estimating sulfur’s crystallization rate, they could then compare how much was preserved in the glassy blobs with the amount of uranium. The difference indicated how much sulfur gas had already percolated out—fully 42 megatons, as the team reports today in Science Advances.Iacovino and her colleagues offer a few reasons why this huge amount of sulfur didn’t seem to cool the planet—or leave much of a mark in Greenland’s ice cores. Paektu is a high-latitude volcano, which means emissions from eruptions tend to stay within the same hemisphere and, thus, have a smaller global cooling effect. The sulfate particles from high-latitude volcanoes also tend to fall out of the stratosphere more quickly than those from tropical eruptions like Tambora. Finally, there is evidence that Paektu blew its top in winter, which would have damped its climatic effect because there would have been less sun for its sulfate particles to reflect.These explanations aren’t convincing, says Alan Robock, a climate scientist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, who specializes in stratospheric sulfates. “With the large sulfur emissions they claim, there would certainly be deposition in Greenland even if the eruption was in the winter,” he says. A simpler explanation might be that the sulfur slowly burped up before the eruption, leaving the emissions from the main blast closer to earlier projections, says Ralf Gertisser, a volcanologist at Keele University in the United Kingdom.But if the study’s higher estimate holds, it should prompt concern about how the evidence from ice cores is used to measure past eruptions, Iacovino says. Rather than automatically assuming that a core gauges an eruption’s emissions, it might be better to take it as a measure of its climatic effect. “People modeling the ancient atmosphere of Earth should think about that.”The study, which resulted from a 2013 visit organized by AAAS (the publisher of Science), was no typical collaboration. With her North Korean colleagues, Iacovino collected pumice dated to before and after the 946 eruption—a time that saw the rise of the Goryeo dynasty, which united the Korean peninsula and gave the modern country its name. Iacovino knew little about Asia, let alone Paektu, at the time. But volcanology brought the groups together. “When we were together in the field, we were talking about the science,” she says. “We forgot about everything else.”But when it came to drafting the paper, things were not so simple. If Iacovino had a question for Kim Ju-Song, her co-author at North Korea’s Earthquake Administration, she couldn’t just pick up the phone. Instead she’d send an email to James Hammond, a volcanologist at the University of London who coordinated the project. Hammond would email the Chinese nongovernmental organization that connected the scientists to North Korea, and this nongovernmental organization would in turn contact Ju-Song. But most of their work still got done in person, which included one trip to London for the North Korean researchers.Although this first round of work is nearing its end, Iacovino is convinced it’s the start of a sustained collaboration with North Korea’s volcanologists. After all, Paektu’s not done either. Although it hasn’t erupted since 1903, it started grumbling again this past decade. Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Iacovino and her co-authors returned to Paektu’s pumice for their new estimates. Scientists have done this elsewhere by measuring the gas content of globs of magma that are preserved, like time capsules, in crystals right before an eruption and comparing it with the gas content of rocks hardened out of magma following the blast. This technique allows scientists to estimate the amount of liquefied gasses—including sulfur—spewed into the air. But it also misses any sulfur that had already shifted into a gas phase in Paektu’s magmatic stew before the eruption. And volcanoes rich in silica like Paektu, which tend to have chunky, viscous magmas, seem to hold a lot of gas. “Imagine a ball of peanut butter, and trying to inject gas into it,” Iacovino says. “It’s going to be pretty easy for the peanut butter to hold on to it.” Richard Stone Straddling the border between China and North Korea, the massive Mount Paektu volcano has long been an enigma. In 946 C.E., Paektu (called Changbai in China) erupted with a force matched by few volcanoes over the past 2000 years. Yet curiously, Paektu’s “millennium eruption” is not thought to have had the same devastating climatic effects as Indonesia’s Mount Tambora, whose 1815 explosion poured 28 megatons of sulfur into the atmosphere, cooling the planet by 1°C and causing the famed “year without a summer.” Now, a new analysis of rocks from Mount Paektu suggests its eruption actually put out 45 megatons of sulfur—far more than Tambora and more than 20 times past estimates based on ice cores in Greenland.”The amount of potential sulfur is huge,” says Kayla Iacovino, a volcanologist at Arizona State University in Tempe who led the study, a rare collaboration between North Korean, U.K., and U.S. scientists. The results, she adds, make Paektu’s apparently weak climactic effect all the more mysterious.Researchers typically estimate the climate effects of ancient eruptions using a mix of rock, ice, and tree-ring records. Sulfur, which turns into sun-reflecting, planet-cooling sulfate particles once it hits the stratosphere, eventually settles around the globe, where it is often preserved in ice cores. But cores in Greenland corresponding to 946 C.E. don’t hold much sulfur, and there is little evidence in the cores and tree rings for a dip in global temperatures at the time. That has led many volcanologists to believe that, although Paektu packed a local punch, it left little in the way of a global legacy. Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Countrylast_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *